Send Us

Vincent-zhong@greatwin-test.com
     Vincent-zhong@gfmachine.com  
 0086-0769-82767811 / 0086-13929200954
Home » News » News » Industry » Meeting Rigorous EU Workwear Regulations: An In-Depth Look at EN ISO 20345 Physical Testing Protocols

Meeting Rigorous EU Workwear Regulations: An In-Depth Look at EN ISO 20345 Physical Testing Protocols

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2026-10-10      Origin: Site

Inquire

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button

Exporting protective footwear to the European Union involves navigating a rigid regulatory landscape governed by the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Regulation (EU) 2016/425. To carry a valid CE mark and clear customs without demurrage or consignment rejection, manufacturers must demonstrate full mechanical compliance under EN ISO 20345:2022, supported by test methodologies defined in EN ISO 20344.

In pre-shipment inspections and accredited laboratory audits, minor oversights in compound vulcanization, sole bonding, or midsole puncture barriers frequently result in failed reports. Establishing an empirical testing routine directly in the factory laboratory prevents high-value shipments from stalling at European ports of entry.

Core Mechanical Protocols Under EN ISO 20344 / EN ISO 20345

The standard evaluates work footwear not as individual decorative parts, but as a consolidated safety system subjected to repeated physical strain, environmental exposure, and sudden impact forces.

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                  EN ISO 20345 / 20344 MECHANICAL COMPLIANCE MATRIX                       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  [Test Module]               [Critical Requirement]         [Governing Clause]           |
|  Dynamic Sole Flexing        ---> 30,000 to 150,000 cycles  ---> EN ISO 20344 Clause 8.4 |
|  Perforation Resistance (P)  ---> >= 1,100 N threshold      ---> EN ISO 20344 Clause 5.8 |
|  Upper/Sole Bond Adhesion    ---> >= 4.0 N/mm bond strength ---> EN ISO 20344 Clause 5.2 |
|  Outsole Abrasion Resistance ---> Relative volume loss mm3  ---> EN ISO 20344 Clause 8.3 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1. Dynamic Sole and Whole-Shoe Flexing Fatigue

Work boots experience complex torsional and angular stresses along the metatarsal hinge during walking cycles. EN ISO 20344 outlines strict cut-growth and whole-shoe bending evaluations:

  • Cut-Growth Thresholds (Bennewart Method): Test specimens subjected to 30,000 flex cycles at room temperature or 150,000 cycles in cold flex conditions must not exhibit cut growth exceeding 4.0 mm.

  • Whole-Shoe Hinge Evaluation: The finished boot must flex repeatedly without delamination along the feather line, cracking across the midsole foam, or detachment of internal composite protective caps.

2. Perforation Resistance: Steel vs. Non-Metallic Textiles

One of the most consequential changes in recent European standards is the distinction between metallic puncture-resistant inserts and non-metallic textile composite plates:

  • Standard Spike Testing: Steel plates undergo penetration checks using a 4.5 mm diameter hardened test nail, requiring a minimum penetration threshold of 1,100 N.

  • Type PL and PS Textile Testing: Synthetic anti-perforation fabrics must be tested using both the standard 4.5 mm nail (Type PL) and the conical 3.0 mm conical pin (Type PS). The smaller diameter tip simulates thin industrial nails, applying localized shear stress that can puncture through lower-density woven weaves if raw fabric tensions vary.

3. Interlayer Adhesion and Sole Abrasion

Bond failures between polyurethane (PU) midsoles and nitrile rubber (NBR) outsoles are immediate failure criteria under CE audit inspections. EN ISO 20344 mandates:

  • A peel strength not lower than 4.0 N/mm across the bond margin (or 3.0 N/mm if material tearing occurs before bond separation).

  • Outsole rotary drum abrasion loss controlled under strict volumetric limits (typically ≤ 150 mm³ for standard compounds; ≤ 250 mm³ for lower-density materials).

Whole Shoe Flexing Tester.jpeg

Key Technical Parameters for In-House Testing Equipment

Factory labs preparing production batches for European distribution rely on calibrated machines with closed-loop controls:

Instrument System

Applicable Standards

Mechanical Parameters & Tolerances

Whole Shoe Flexing Tester

EN ISO 20344 Clause 8.4, SATRA TM92

Continuous 35°–45° flex angle, 100 to 140 cpm, automated cycle preset

Penetration Resistance Tester

EN ISO 20344 Clause 5.8, ASTM F2412

10 ± 3 mm/min crosshead speed, 3.0 mm / 4.5 mm test nails, 0.5-class load cell

Rotary Drum Abrasion Tester

EN ISO 20344 Clause 8.3, ISO 4649

40 rpm drum rotation, 2.5 mm lateral feed rate, 10 N / 5 N specimen deadweights

Upper/Outsole Peel Tester

EN ISO 20344 Clause 5.2, SATRA TM404

100 ± 20 mm/min crosshead speed, synchronized peak/average force logging

Mitigating Sourcing Liabilities Through Production-Floor QA

Relying entirely on quarterly reports from external inspection agencies exposes export schedules to blind spots:

  1. Batch-to-Batch Compound Shifts: Polyurethane polyol/isocyanate ratios fluctuate with humidity and temperature during direct-injection molding. Unchecked shifts reduce flex crack resistance long before visual flaws appear.

  2. Textile Layer Shifting: When lasting technicians assemble non-metallic puncture boards, improper lasting margins can pinch the fabric edge, dropping localized penetration resistance below the required 1,100 N mark.

  3. Adhesive Curing Inconsistencies: Primer flash times and halogenation steps vary during seasonal shifts, requiring daily bond peel checks to verify adhesion strength.

Implementing factory-level physical test machines ensures that every lot dispatched meets EU technical criteria before documentation reaches customs brokers.

Direct Technical Inquiries & Equipment Configurations

Great Win Instrument Co., Ltd. designs, manufactures, and calibrates laboratory-grade testing machines built to European and international footwear standards.

GREAT WIN
Phone:
0086-0769-82767811
0086-13929200954
Address:
A6,Huazhi high-tech park,Yongqing Village,Daojiao Town,Dongguan City,Guangdong Province , China
About Us
Great Win Testing Machine CO. Ltd was set up in 1999, it has been over 20 years' history in the field of professional experience for lab testing instrument such as Footwear Testing Equipment, Leather Testing Equipment, Textile Testing Equipment, Toy Testing ...
Subscribe
 Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest news.

© 2021 Great Win Testing Machine CO. Ltd All rights reserved. Technology By Leadong.com | Sitemap